|
回复:(weiyuanjie)求助:出现这样的警告及错误如何...
The bilinear kinematic hardening model (BKIN) usually cannot represent large-strain effects well because of the constant tangent modulus. The true stress-strain slope of most metals usually changes as the strains increase, but the bilinear model fails to account for this due to its simple <BR>representation. This means that the yield surface can translate forever in principal stress space, even allowing for the unrealistic possibility of passing through the origin. <BR>There are two multilinear kinematic hardening models available in ANSYS, namely MKIN and KINH. Both models use the sublayer model, which can be thought of as a weighted response of multiple elasto-perfectly-plastic ‘layers.’ A simplified view of this is that, as a layer ‘yields,’ it becomes perfectly plastic, so it provides no stiffness response; this allows for the modeling of a piecewise linear curve. The author recommends using KINH over MKIN due to the following reasons: <BR>• KINH allows up to 20 points per stress-strain curve, whereas MKIN only allows up to 5 points. <BR>• For KINH, input is done via TBPT commands, which is more consistent with other piecewiselinear models such as MISO and MELAS, but MKIN relies on TBDATA input. <BR>• KINH allows up to 40 temperature-dependent curves, whereas MKIN allows only 5 temperature-dependent curves. Furthermore, in the case of temperature-dependent curves,MKIN requires each curve to have the same strain values, whereas KINH does not.KINH is the same as MKIN with TBOPT=2, or use of Rice’s model for temperature-dependency. <BR>As a result, KINH behaves the same as MKIN (TBOPT=2), so, due to the reasons mentioned above, the user should consider using KINH. |
|